In her article on "10 Ways to Assess Learning Without Tests", Edna Sackson highlights 10 plausible tasks meant as alternative modes of
assessment. I have selected 3 of them for the purpose of this post as they
appear to be the most applicable in the field of teaching, learning, and
assessing Literature.
Making a Video:
Sackson suggests that video making as a form of assessment is effective as it
allows students to demonstrate their learning and inject their own
interpretation to their understanding of the subject matter. I find this quite
pertinent and useful as the process of creating a video requires a fair extent
of personal insight and perspective, which allows both the student and teacher
to view the content from a fresh angle. While Sackson has not indicated if
video generation should be done individually or in groups, I would propose the
latter, so as to allow students to consider multiple perspectives within the
same context. When I was in Secondary 4, I was similarly offered this mode of
assessment as part of the Language Arts programme undertaken by the school. The
whole process of writing the script, casting, filming, and editing spanned a
period of almost 2 months; but the eventual product was amazing because it
encapsulated a whole spectrum of preliminary ideas, filmic techniques, as well
as post-processing effects. One aspect which our assessor/teacher found
particularly fascinating was our ability to showcase alternate dimensions of
time and space within the same video – something that is difficult to achieve
and effectively portray in a standard role-play or face-to-face presentation.
Through the use of costumes, dialogues, and editing especially, we were able to
transcend the boundaries of limited space and time to present to our audience
the characters’ ability to be teleported from one era to another. This was
particularly effective in communicating to our fellow peers the essence and
significance of transgression, as well as the contrasting characteristics of
past and present contexts.
Composing a Song:
Next, Sackson proposes that song
composition offers students an avenue to articulate their learning, comprehension,
and opinions. Sackson suggests that song composition can be carried out in two
ways: students can create their own music from scratch, or “write new lyrics
that can be sung to the melody of an existing song” (Sackson,
2010) .
At this point, I cannot help but recall how the latter process effectively taps
on students’ prior knowledge. In lower Secondary, my class was partially
assessed on such a component: creating, composing, and then singing a song
relating the events of the Japanese Occupation during WW2. I fondly remember
how my group adapted our piece from the song “When you Believe”, by Whitney
Houston (I think). Our assessor took quite well to it, commenting that we had
chosen an appropriate melody which matched the mood and atmosphere of the Jap
Op and reflected the agony, pain, and sense of loss experienced during the war.
I would definitely incorporate this means of assessment in my future classes as
well – perhaps I could task my class to compose a song describing the plot
progression/character traits/character relationships within a particular
drama/prose/poem. This can be further improvised by instructing students to present their analysis of setting and characterization through their songs. And of course, I intend for my students to perform their
completed masterpieces in class too – imagine how much fun that can potentially be!
Student Choice:
Finally, Sackson recommends that teachers may create room
for students to present their understanding, findings, and analysis in any
manner which they find appropriate. At the same time, she recognises that such
a proposition may be overly simplistic and ambiguous as it depends on what is
being assessed. While I do acknowledge the limitation of such a flexible and
open form of assessment, I think there is potential to administer it in certain
streams in the local classroom. This might be more suitable for the higher-ability
students, who are likely to possess a higher capacity of comprehension and
understanding, and tend to be discerning in terms of the format they choose to employ.
If students display the ability to take ownership of their learning and have demonstrated
a considerable degree of independence and self-motivation in their work, it is
likely that allowing them to choose their own mode of assessment would yield
refreshing and perhaps even eye-opening results. J
Works Cited
Sackson, E. (2010,
September 10). 10 Ways to Assess Learning Without Tests. Retrieved from
What Ed Said:
http://whatedsaid.wordpress.com/2010/09/15/10-ways-to-assess-learning-without-tests/
I really like these ideas. They are fun and engaging and I believe the students will definitely enjoy working on these kinds of assignments and projects rather than writing essays all the time haha.
ReplyDeleteThe examples mentioned above seems plausible enough in the Singaporean context especially example two because it makes poetry more accessible to our students. However, the first assessment seems very open-ended. What might the subject matter be if students are asked to create a video? Will it be a drama re-enactment or a poetry reading? If it is a drama, then are students expected to write their own scripts or will an adaptation of an existing piece suffice?
ReplyDeleteHi Yi Xian, looks like you had interesting tasks to complete at school. These are good ways of assessing students, question is how do you prepare students so that they can really learn from the assignment while having lots of fun.
ReplyDelete