The memory of the earliest books I read were
definitely the Enid Bylton series. But honestly, what I remember of Enid Bylton
are not the stories but the tactile/emotional experiences of receiving a new
book from my parents, feeling the hardcover, plunging myself into another world
for a couple of hours and then joyfully adding it to my collection of books.
This simple routine slowly built itself into a tradition which I now include in
my life (of course, in a very different form) as a treasured moment. I probably
“grew out” of Enid Bylton after awhile and my next book obsession were
adventure or mystery stories. In particular, I was drawn to stories that
feature a group of children gathering together to solve a crime or going on an
adventure. Although I was not particularly devoted to any individual author and
was quite haphazard in picking out books on my library visits, two particular
series that I probably devoured entirely were “The Boxcar Children” and
“Kinetic City Super Crew”. I also really enjoyed the “Bookworm Gang” series,
something which I anticipated reading every month because I subscribed to the
Bookworm monthly magazine (a digest of short stories and articles I think). It
is interesting to consider the content of the books I was drawn to on hindsight
because I distinctly remember reporting to adults who asked if I felt lonely as
an only child that I was perfectly content being in my own world of books. Yet,
the books I was reading were all about children who belonged to tribes that
went out of the house and did meaningful things together. I was unaware that
ideas which I was exposed to as a child would soon became important values for
me later in life – Although I did not relate them to the stories I read, the
older me went on to champion and cherish concepts such as being a part of a knitted
community, striving for something that counts when working as a team and wanting
to go beyond my comfort zone with a bunch of like-minded individuals.
Around late Primary School to most of my
Secondary School years, I entered a phase where I somehow decided that I would
read only non-fiction texts leisure. This conviction probably came from two
places: Firstly, I was shaped by my father’s reading preferences. Although he
was an avid reader and was always with a book, he only read non-fiction books
that were in the areas of philosophy, psychology, religion or management. Due
to his influence and the physical accessibility of his library of books, my
interaction with books became almost purely intellectual (How do you get to the
heart without the pavement that is story?). Another reason was that it was when
I started to avidly embrace another story source that is the Role-Playing Game
(RPG). I will not specify them since they aren’t strictly books, but they were
definitely texts that were rich with narratives and I think I might have reaped
the same kinds of fruits from such texts if I were immersed in fictional print texts
instead (contentious topic that deserves more discussion that just a glossing
over, I know).
Although I was lost in such an unfortunate
position in my reading journey, what I remembered of those non-fiction texts
were not the abstractions or the academic explanations but the narratives that
embedded themselves in the writing either as illustrations or as a means of
conveying an idea. Hence, the texts that were more formative and impactful to
me were texts which took the shape of a narrative rather than an argument,
blending in the benefits of the story with the coherence and structure of an
essay. However, as a young reader of such types of texts, I don’t think I
gathered the gems I should have. I have re-read a lot of the texts later on in
life to be freshly rewarded by insights that my younger mind had completely
overlooked. To name a few examples of the type of books I was reading in this
phase: Victor Frankl’s “Man’s Search for Meaning” shook my ideas about the
human condition and woke me to how some things simply cannot be expressed in the form of abstractions. C.S. Lewis’s “The Screwtape
Letters” revealed to me the captivating power of putting argument into a mode
of story. Reading up on Existentialism required me to capture the ideas in
narrative and so I read ‘Existential’ works of fiction by Albert Camus like
‘The Plague” and “The Stranger”. These texts revealed to me how some ideas
cannot just be told because they must
be felt.
Of course, I was very much a kid at that
period too and so I did not abide to my reading conviction as if it were a
rigid principle. Like most kids growing up in that time, I got onto the Harry
Potter bandwagon; I also indulged in random Science Fiction novels and (sigh)
Nicholas Sparks. An author who I remember really enjoying was Aldous Huxley and
I read both his essays and his fiction works.
I was only thoroughly convinced of the
power and importance of fiction once I became an English Literature Major in
NUS. This was in itself a tenuous position for my reading journey because what
I read was controlled by the texts on the courses I was taking at that time
(Typically, we will impress the other majors by announcing how we could have up
to 30 books to read in a single semester). Despite this apparent rigidity, the
vibrancy of the academic context led me to become much more appreciative of how
literary texts could be situated in much broader contexts of theory, period and
culture. At this juncture, it is difficult to divorce my reading journey from
my academic education. Honestly, as an English Literature major, I felt that I
was playing “catch-up” on all the great works I was supposed to be reading and
hence it was admittedly a less organic and more intentional process as I soon
found out how I was drawn to authors like Jeanette Winterson, Ernest Hemingway,
F. Scott Fitzgerald, J.M. Coetzee and Toni Morrison. There were definitely some
indulgences that were outside this clinical process of ‘being a good literature
major’ – I enjoyed Tana French’s series on the “Dublin Murder Squad” for her
presentation of the emotional but professional detective and Young Adult
Fiction like “Divergent”. A late but moving discovery was “Flowers for Algernon”
which eventually became one of my texts for my Honors Thesis.
I guess it is only post-graduation when I
can consider what my reading preferences truly are in a more personal way,
without the regulation of academia. While it is an acceptable and popular
notion to find a “voice” as a writer, this simple reflection has caused me to
realise that it is might be as important to find an “eye” as a reader too!
Hi Gregory, you are right in pointing out that there are many possible texts to a reading identity, from RPG to magazines. In fact, the pleasure of receiving a magazine or bookworm club subscription is part of the entire experience of reading as is the feel and touch of turning the pages. I guess our reading preferences do change along the way - we all have our seasons. Reading into our seasons may allow us to read into ourselves.
ReplyDeleteHi Greg! I really enjoyed reading your post. I was especially able to relate to the books you read during your childhood. (I fondly remember the Bookworm gang too! My favourite character was Samseng.) In particular, I really like how you articulately and artfully summed up Lewis' "The Screwtape Letters" as an argument presented in the form of a story. Fascinating!
ReplyDeleteHi Greg, a very honest post. I can relate to you on how when we are young we choose books that stir our sense of adventure, and how this changes at different stages in our lives. Yet, as you pointed out, we read for different reasons and it is important to immerse ourselves in that which stirs us as well.
ReplyDelete